Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, January 15, 2007

Are You Ready For The Tax Hike The Democrats Are Cooking?

Because it’s about to be served up, hot and tasty, on Thursday.  That’s right, just 15 days into the new Congress and already the Dems are reaching for our wallets.

On Thursday, the House of Representatives will vote on legislation to increase taxes for the first time since 1993. It took just 15 days of new found power for the Democrats to raise taxes. The first vote of the 110th Congress removed the 3/5 supermajority to raise taxes. The following day was a vote to enact a new rule requiring offsetting tax increases for every tax cut.

So it was only a matter of time before the first actual vote to raise taxes came up.

Right.  But the Democrats did pass that Paygo thing requiring that any cut in taxes be compensated for with a hike in another sort of tax, so I guess we’re supposed to applaud them for their budgeting prowess.  Or something.

Anyway, I wonder what happened around 1993 that put us in this current tax hike drought?  Any guesses out there?

The significance of this should not be underestimated as Thursday’s vote is the first step in reversing what could be considered the best run for American taxpayers since the creation of the income tax. Using the Treasury Department study by Jerry Tempalski we count the longest run between legislation being enacted into law with a net tax increase occurring from 1952 through 1966. The 15-year period is slightly longer than the current 13-year period but it is our hope President Bush will veto these tax increases through 2008.

You can say what you want about the President, but nobody can take the massive tax relief he gave Americans in his first term away from him.  Let’s hope he holds the line on our current level of taxation by using his veto to keep the Democrats away from our wallets.  Outside of Iraq, it could be the most important thing he does with his time in office from here on out.

Comments

NO...No way!

Zsa Zsa on January 15, 2007 at 08:26 pm

Tax and spend.


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on January 15, 2007 at 08:36 pm

More funds for the government to spend. Bad news for Social Sec. as usual…

Zsa Zsa on January 15, 2007 at 08:53 pm
Avatar for Spifficus

Probably to pay off some of the debt from the war. Those kind of things get expensive.

Spifficus on January 16, 2007 at 02:56 am

Probably to pay off some of the debt from the war. Those kind of things get expensive.

So raise tax rates and get less tax revenue.

This makes sense to you?

likwidshoe on January 16, 2007 at 02:59 am

Nothing like killing the economy with taxing the crap out of the rich. Its basic class warfare. No one should be shocked that these baffoons wanted to raise taxes. I find it funny that they danced all around it during the election and apparently they think we have all forgotten as soon as they get into office.


Check out:
Goon’s North Dakota Red Neck
Goon’s World

goon on January 16, 2007 at 03:03 am
Avatar for Spifficus

So what you are saying, ‘goon’, is that when the poor get a break the rich declare war on the poor and vise versa? My guess is that the dems in office, being rich themselves, are worried about the poor declaring war on the rich. The poor (a.k.a working class), or those who are not extravagantly wealthy like the politicians in office, do outnumber the rich and things do occasionally turn ugly or worse. But, like it or not, if something extravagant did happen tomorrow even the dems on Capitol Hill would receive the protection of America’s permanent middle class; it’s police and military.

And besides, the poor & the working class are the dems voter base. If they didn’t raise taxes for the rich they’d be putting themselves out of a job. Nobody would fire themselves voluntarily would they? Who would these working class people vote for then? Those ‘Green Party’ slackers? Probably. Maybe even another party thats not currently on the political radar. But not republican—not now considering the public view of the GOP’s trademark as being ‘damaged goods’. The repubs will have to get a drastic makeover to market their brand to these people, if that is what they wish.

Spifficus on January 16, 2007 at 07:02 am

The rich?...Uh huh. Ya right! What they call rich is individuals who are on the high end of the earning scale. The truly rich get all kinds of breaks.

Zsa Zsa on January 16, 2007 at 07:08 am

Spifficus if the dems are successfull at taxing the rich who already pays the most taxes the dems are going to kill the economy because the first thing businesses will do is they will raise prices to keep their profit margins and will cause inflation. Inflation will cause corporations to lay off people. Job loss is not good.

Lowering taxes increases revenue.


Check out:
Goon’s North Dakota Red Neck
Goon’s World

goon on January 16, 2007 at 08:04 am
Avatar for WOOF

by using his veto to keep the Democrats away from our wallets.

Your conservative identity was stolen and your Visa card
run past its max by Bush and his cohorts. They lifted your wallet and took your surplus. Now all you have is an overdrawn debit card.

Lowering taxes increases revenue.

But results in less revenue than if taxes were not lowered.
Net Deficit.

To spend is to tax. This President borrowed and spent.
Now he wants a balanced budget.

Hang on to your dreams of dismantaling
Americas safety nets.
Ride them into political irrelevance.
A large portion of the Republican party
leaves you in their dust.

WOOF on January 16, 2007 at 10:35 am

Your conservative identity was stolen and your Visa card
run past its max by Bush and his cohorts. They lifted your wallet and took your surplus.

“Your surplus”? Why would a government run a surplus? It’s not a business.

How did they lift our wallets with a tax rate cut?

But results in less revenue than if taxes were not lowered.

WRONG! (How many times do you have to be told this?) Check out what happened to tax revenues after tax rates were lowered by JFK, Reagan, and Bush. You have no excuse of ignorance anymore. You’re simply lying at this point.

Hang on to your dreams of dismantaling
Americas safety nets.

“Safety nets”? They’re Ponzi Schemes.

likwidshoe on January 16, 2007 at 10:42 am

I don’t think American are entitled to socialism that some have suggested by confiscating money from people to redistribute income. It pisses me off when I hear people suggest that they somehow are entitled some rich person’s money. The USA is not a marxist state, I don’t care what the Sociology and Political sciene professors are teaching you.


Check out:
Goon’s North Dakota Red Neck
Goon’s World

goon on January 16, 2007 at 06:08 pm
Avatar for Spifficus

Re: “will raise prices”

Not everyone will see the connection of increased taxes to corporations raising prices. The dems will pull some garbage like blaming corporate greed and flash some papers with numbers “proving” that CEOs in America get paid more than in any other country. Then they’ll hold us accountable for being overly dependent on corporate products and services and try to sell us on how privatization is a bad idea.

Spifficus on January 17, 2007 at 09:49 am

Goon, You took the words right out of my mouth!…

Zsa Zsa on January 17, 2007 at 10:37 am

Just to clarify things: a “govt surplus” means they confiscated more money than they spent.  It’s not a good thing; it’s theft.  Even if you agree with all govt spending, they are not entitled to take more than they need.  The surplus isn’t “ours”, it’s money taken from us in excess of the govt need.  It’s “theirs”.


The only legitimate role of government with regard to economics is to prevent fraud and provide a remedy- civil and criminal penalties- in case of fraud.

People have the mistaken notion that the free market has no rules.  But it most certainly does.  All our problems are due to government meddling.

robert108 on January 17, 2007 at 10:46 am

Just to clarify things: a “govt surplus” means they confiscated more money than they spent.  It’s not a good thing; it’s theft.  Even if you agree with all govt spending, they are not entitled to take more than they need.  The surplus isn’t “ours”, it’s money taken from us in excess of the govt need.  It’s “theirs”.

Exactly, now give ups our f’n money back. Its ours and the Government stole it from us under the guise of social engineering. I remember someone saying that they lost like 40 percent of their income to taxes, I know for a fact I lose 34% so thank god I am not in that person income bracket. I mean, that is high enough, so under that logic if you make 150,000 a year your only going to get about 80,000 of that. I dont’ blame these guys for hiring tax attourneys to find ways to hide our hard earned income. Its our money so the democrats cant take it from them.


Check out:
Goon’s North Dakota Red Neck
Goon’s World

goon on January 17, 2007 at 11:54 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.