Little kid “originality”; you’re at your own level, rbb.
You lefties are the fascists; conservatives believe in individual independence.

rbb is stupid because he’s a leftie. Lefties lie about their real agenda in this country(not in China, though), and because they are “feelers” rather than thinkers, they fall for an ideology that assuages their feelings.
rbb is just another “useful idiot” for the commie cause.

RBB,

Come on, bob….you could have picked a better example than that. The only thing she was interested in was her own self-promotion. She’s a fluffy, disdainful creature and couldn’t wash dishes for someone like Child.

Her appeal was just denied, too, by the way. Loser.

Spies are very rarely the people you would expect them to be.

I read of Julia Child’s involvement with OSS some years ago, I’ll try to dig that book out of the stacks.

I didn’t think you would know who Hayden is.

Must be nice for you nutters living in a fact free world.

“SEATED at the Washington Gridiron dinner March 31, I was interrupted by a man crouching at my feet who was dressed Air Force formal with the four stars of a full general. It was CIA Director Michael Hayden, who complained to me profanely that my column had misrepresented him in the Valerie Plame Wilson case. Denying he favors Democrats, Gen. Hayden indicated to me he had not authorized Democratic Rep. Henry Waxman to say Plame had been a “covert” CIA employee, as he claimed Hayden did, but only that she was “undercover.”

At the Gridiron, Hayden made similar points with Rep. Peter Hoekstra, the House Intelligence Committee’s ranking Republican; Republican lawyer Victoria Toensing, an expert in national-security law; and White House Counsel Fred Fielding. Yet, 10 days later, the CIA and its director asserted to me that the wife of Bush critic Joseph Wilson indeed had been “covert.” The designation could strengthen erroneous claims that she came under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act.

Nobody ever will be prosecuted under the act for revealing Mrs. Wilson worked for the CIA. But Hayden has raised GOP suspicions that he is angling to become intelligence czar – director of national intelligence – under a Democratic president. While Hayden proclaims himself free of politics, his handling of the Plame case is puzzling.”
http://www.nypost.com/seven/04122007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/cia_chiefs_plame_games_opedcolumnists_robert_d__novak.htm

Acquiese what, RBB?

Those indictments . . . where are they?

Statement of Rep. Henry A. Waxman
Chairman, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Hearing on Disclosure of CIA
Agent Valerie Plame Wilson’s Identity and White House Procedures for Safeguarding
Classified Information
March 16,2007

I have been advised by the CIA that even now, after all that has happened, I cannot disclose
the full nature, scope, and character of Ms. Wilson’s service to our nation without causing serious
damage to our national security interests.

But General Hayden and the CIA have cleared these following comments for today’s hearing.

During her employment at the CIA, Ms. Wilson was under cover.

Her employment status with the CIA was classified information prohibited fiom disclosure under Executive Order 12958.

At the time of the publication of Robert Novak’s column on July 14,2003, Ms. Wilson’s CIA employment status was covert.

This was classified information.

Ms. Wilson served in senior management positions at the CIA, in which she oversaw the work of other CIA employees, and she attained the level of GS-14, step 6 under the federal pay scale.

Ms. Wilson worked on some of the most sensitive and highly secretive matters handled by the CIA.

Ms. Wilson served at various times overseas for the CIA.

Without discussing the specifics of Ms. Wilson’s classified work, it is accurate to say that she worked on the prevention of the development and use of weapons of mass destruction against the United States.

In her various positions at the CIA, Ms. Wilson faced significant risks to her personal safety and her life.

She took on serious risks on behalf of her country.
Ms. Wilson’s work in many situations had consequences for the security of her colleagues, and maintaining her cover was critical to protecting the safety of both colleagues and others.

The disclosure of Ms. Wilson’s employment with the CIA had several serious effects.

First, it terminated her covert job opportunities with CIA.
Second, it placed her professional contacts at greater risk.
And third, it undermined the trust and confidence with which future CIA employees and sources hold the United States.

This disclosure of Ms. Wilson’s classified employment status with the CIA was so detrimental that the CIA filed a crimes report with the Department of Justice.

As I mentioned, Ms. Wilson’s work was so sensitive that even now, she is still prohibited from discussing many details of her work in public because of the continuing risk to CIA officials and assets in the field and to the CIA’S ongoing work.

Some have suggested that Ms. Wilson did not have a sensitive position with the CIA or a position of unusual risk.

As a CIA employee, Ms. Wilson has taken a life-long oath to protect classified information, even after her CIA employment has ended.

As a result, she cannot respond to most of the statements made about her.

I want to make clear, however, that any characterization that minimizes the personal risk Ms. Wilson accepted in her assignments is flatly wrong.

There should be no confusion on this point.

Ms. Wilson has provided great service to our nation and has fulfilled her obligation to protect classified information admirably.

We are confident that she will uphold it again today.

That concludes the characterizations that the CIA is permitting us to make today.

Thank you.

I accept your acquiescence.

Ken, I know you aren’t the best reader and that a long post confuses you, so I will give you the important bits…sound OK?

OK!

• …General Hayden and the CIA have cleared these following comments for today’s hearing.

• During her employment at the CIA, Ms. Wilson was under cover.

• At the time of the publication of Robert Novak’s column on July 14, 2003, Ms. Wilson’s CIA employment status was covert.

• This disclosure of Ms. Wilson’s classified employment status with the CIA was so detrimental that the CIA filed a crimes report with the Department of Justice.

• I want to make clear, however, that any characterization that minimizes the personal risk Ms. Wilson accepted in her assignments is flatly wrong.

• That concludes the characterizations that the CIA is permitting us to make today.

CIA fact:

At the time of the publication of Robert Novak’s column on July 14, 2003, Ms. Wilson’s CIA employment status was covert.

From the dismissal:

Because the Wilsons have failed to state constitutional … claims for which relief may be granted and failed to exhaust their administrative remedies as required … we affirm the judgment of the district court dismissing the Wilsons’ amended complaint in its entirety,” the court said.

Re: They need better lawyers
They haven’t finished up with other avenues of redress.

108 is stupid because he’s a rightie.

Says the dimbulb who says that historical inaccuracies are “technically true“!

RebTex you’re __________________ and _____________ besides being_____.

108 is stupid because he’s a rightie. Righties lie about their real agenda in this country (not in China, though), and because they are “thieves” rather than thinkers, they worship profit over people.
108 is just another “useful idiot” for the fascist cause.

RBB
I see your “____________” & imply that you’re a __________,a _________, & a bit of a ____________.

Hayden is the CIA director, RBB.

Gee, I even blogged about it way back when.

http://www.willisms.com/archives/2006/05/lt_general_mich.html

You were saying, RBB?

Hey RBB, how is that Plame lawsuit going, by the way?

Oh that’s right . . . DISMISSED, yet again.