Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Saturday, August 02, 2008

Apparently Employers Don’t Have A Right To Free Speech

I’m not sure why this is controversial:

Wal-Mart spokesman Dave Tovar told The Associated Press that the company did discuss the bill with its employees, including what it sees as the negative impact, and noted that the company’s stand on the legislation is no secret.

“We believe the Employee Free Choice Act is a bad bill and we have been on the record as opposed to it,” he said.

But he said the company wasn’t advocating that its employees vote against backers of the legislation.

“If anyone representing Wal-Mart gave the impression… they are wrong and acting without approval,” said Tovar. In fact, he said that Wal-Mart has been working with both Republicans and Democrats.

First, it’s worth nothing that the horribly misnamed “Employee Free Choice Act” (which is legislation that would prevent workers from keeping their preference as to whether or not to unionize a secret so that they can be harassed by the unions) is actively supported by every union in the country.  So the idea that Wal-Mart, one of the unions’ biggest targets, would want to give its side of the issue to its employees and encourage them not to support the bill or the people who support the bill isn’t terribly surprising.

You can agree or disagree with Wal-Mart on the issue (I agree with them), but the company has just as much of a right to oppose the bill as the unions have a right to support it.

As for telling employees who to vote for, seems to me that if Wal-Mart wants to run campaigns in its stores against certain politicians (or even for others) that, again, is their right.  You know, “free speech” and all that.  Typically getting entangled in politics to that degree isn’t a good thing for a company, but on the flip side making bad business decisions isn’t against the law.

If the employees don’t like the campaigning they can work somewhere else.  If customers don’t like it, they can shop somewhere else.

I think the real problem here, as is the case with most criticism with Wal-Mart, is that the unions don’t like what Wal-Mart is doing.  The unions are upset that the retail giant is opposing their efforts to remove free choice from the labor organization and the unions don’t like it.

Comments

True.  This is a way for unions to force people to pay them for the right to work.


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on August 2, 2008 at 06:55 am

Lefties hate WalMart, since it gives the lie to all their welfare bullshit.  The free enterprise system works far better than govt redistribution.  Anything WalMart does is going to be demonized by the loony left.


The only legitimate role of government with regard to economics is to prevent fraud and provide a remedy- civil and criminal penalties- in case of fraud.

People have the mistaken notion that the free market has no rules.  But it most certainly does.  All our problems are due to government meddling.

robert108 on August 2, 2008 at 09:25 am
Avatar for crshedd

the problem i have read about is that what wal-mart did is okay with salaried employees such as managers but is illegal to do this with hourly employees. some of those required to attend were supervisors, hourly employees.

crshedd on August 2, 2008 at 01:30 pm
Rob
Rob
19961 comments
Send a private message

Why in the world would it be ok for one group of employees but not another?

If Wal-Mart wants to preach politics to its employees that’s Wal-Mart’s business.  You know, free speech?

If the employees don’t want to attend they can work for someone else.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on August 2, 2008 at 01:49 pm

I think if it’s OK for Rev Wright to scream “God Damn America” and “the United States of KKKA” from the pulpit, it’s OK for WalMart to inform its employees about how they might be affected by an upcoming Presidential election.


The only legitimate role of government with regard to economics is to prevent fraud and provide a remedy- civil and criminal penalties- in case of fraud.

People have the mistaken notion that the free market has no rules.  But it most certainly does.  All our problems are due to government meddling.

robert108 on August 2, 2008 at 01:51 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.