AP Wants to Charge Bloggers By the Word

In a move prompting a number of bloggers to simply boycott AP stories, The Associated Press has a set fee structure for the use of quotes from their stories.
Tim Conneally at BetaNews has this:

The AP’s disharmony with bloggers may have only just begun, as the alternative it’s now offering to being served with takedown notices involves paying an up-front sum for excerpting online articles — as few as five words.
A meeting between the Associated Press’ Vice President for Strategic Planning Jim Kennedy and Robert Cox, who heads the Media Bloggers Association, is now planned for Thursday of this week. The subject at hand is the AP’s attempt to find a new way of sharing AP content, which now involves a fee per excerpt based on its word length.
On the heels of a blogosphere revolt last week because of its harsh actions against social news site The Drudge Retort, the AP regrouped over the weekend to take a less litigative — but more bureaucratic — approach to dealing with those who wish to quote its material.

The above excerpt, had it been an AP story, at their current rate per this sheet , would be $50.00.
Fifty bucks??? Er, Rob, we need to talk about my expense account! As for me, I’ll join the blogcott. If it happens on AP, it simply doesn’t exist!
Hat tip LGF
Cross Posted at Proof Positive

Tags:


«
»
  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    Fighting fair use cases can be expensive.

    It’s rather simple to deny people money. Al Sharpton lost a verdict in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. I have no problem walking into a court room and telling a judge, jury and prosecutioner to kiss my ass, then walking back out.

    There’s absolutely nothing any court can do, because the way the law is written, the AP’s stories are fair use.

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    What? for canned, biased, Democrats’ stories? I’ll stick to The Truth from people like Michael Yon and others with boots down.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    I’ve decided we shouldn’t even use their real initials. Let me see…26 letters in the alphabet, 2 letters in “AP”.
    Divide 26 by 2, gives us 13.
    Add 1 letter to the “A” and 3 letters to the “P”. That would give us…

    “BS”

    Heh.

  • 2Hotel9

    AP is losing money by the bucket full. They, along with other print media, think they can force people to purchase their crap, when as soon as it hits the internet people read it for free. The same lesson Metalica has yet to learn. Once it hits the public domain, through broadcast or internet, it is gone from your control. Don’t like that? Don’t broadcast or publish to the internet.

  • Pilgrim

    They obviously haven’t given consideration to how much more exposure many of their otherwise unnoticed stories get through the blogs and the links to them.

    Way to think it through, AP, way to think it through.

  • jpe

    Fair use rule. I’ll continue quoting them for free.

    Fighting fair use cases can be expensive. It’s fact intensive, meaning that most cases can go to a jury if that’s what either side wants, and that’s where lawyers get reallllly expensive. It might be the time for a bona fide blogger defense fund, because the AP is basically threatening to sue valid exercises of free speech.

  • http://oregonguythinks.blogspot.com/ OregonGuy

    Hope this doesn’t bankrupt you, but the following words are from an AP article:

    The…sources…damage…concerns…outlook…Bush’s harsh policies…change…Obama…new direction…

    That’s twelve words. Let me know how the billing thing works out.

    .

  • Pilgrim

    By the way…if an AP story is quoted on radio or TV, does the same apply?

    Same thing. Why not?

  • pparets

    If the AP charged fairly for what their bilge is worth, they would be paying us for quoting them.

  • http://www.DesertConservative.com/ Lee S Gliddon Jr

    For the most part I post articles written by AP reporters just to comment and correct their Liberal statements!

    If they want to get paid for thier works that they PUBLISH as news, then maybe they will get fewer readers!

    To see what I rebut on AP stories, visit http://www.DesertConservative.com...
    Hey, SayAnything, NICE BLOG! Lee

  • Mickey

    So much for Free Speech.

  • Mickey

    So much for Free Speech.

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    Fair use rule.

    I’ll continue quoting them for free. And they can kiss my ass.

  • Bat One

    There just might be something here worth discussing if AP didn’t have such a thoroughly disreputable history of liberal, anti-American bias and outright make believe.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    BTW, Chief: The new fee for commenting on my threads is, uh…$50.25! (Guy’s got to make a profit! )

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    AP is losing money by the bucket full.

    They’re following the model of the New York Times. The Times wanted to charge an access fee to read its wonderful columnists: Maureen Dowd & Co.
    People stayed away from them in droves! The Times finally relented and began giving away Dowd’s fishwrappings for free. But what the Times lost was any influence their writers might have had while they were closeted behind pay per view firewall and any prestige that might have accompanied it.

    AP will find themselves quoted less and less while their brand name and reputation diminishes, unless they can find a way out of this without losing too much face.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development