Anti-Gun Policies Are Their Own Worst Enemy

An interesting excerpt from an article about the Supreme Court taking up the Heller vs. Washington DC case:

At the center of the case is the nation’s capital city, Washington, which has some of the toughest gun control laws in the country.
Private possession of handguns is strictly banned here, and any rifles or shotguns kept in homes must be disassembled or kept under a trigger lock.
Washington government officials say the ban, instituted in 1976, is necessary to keep street violence and murder rates down, and that the second amendment protects gun rights for people associated with militias, not individuals.
“I’m confident in our case, and our continued ability to protect residents from gun violence,” said Mayor Adrian Fenty upon filing his legal team’s brief earlier this month.

Meanwhile…

Gun violence rose sharply in the District in 2007, with the number of homicides jumping 7 percent after several years of decline.
The city had recorded 181 killings as of late yesterday, an increase that police officials attributed in part to escalating violence in the drug trade and fighting among neighborhood gangs. Nonfatal shootings and other gun crimes were also up, preliminary police data show.

What’s more, DC (which has the strictest gun laws in the nation) has the worst crime rates of its entire Maryland/Virginia area:

In the Washington region, only Prince George’s County came close to the District in the number of homicides, recording 144 killings last year, up from 136 the year before. At one point, the county sought help from federal and state law enforcement officials to deal with a spike in homicides. But the overall number of homicides in the region remained steady from 2006, as increases in the District and Prince George’s were offset by a substantial decline in Northern Virginia.

So what’s different in Virginia as compared to Washington DC to make crime go down there?
Virginia has “lax” gun laws. Which begs the question: Are DC’s tough, unconstitutional anti-gun laws really keeping people safe?

Tags: , , , ,


«
»
  • http://Array Christine

    I have to say that in theory I was always a gun ban proponent because I’m anti-gun and anti-violence. But, since moving to the district, I’ve been just annoyed that I can’t own one. Especially when I see that there was another home invasion or something. Not that I think owning a gun is the answer, but it doesn’t make sense that law-abiding people can’t own them. Oh, and to the DC versus MD/VA thing–many of the criminals who come into the district and commit crimes are from those areas.

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    Gun violence rose sharply in the District in 2007, with the number of homicides jumping 7 percent after several years of decline.

    What happened in 2007 on the lines of gun laws? All I remember is the DC gun ban being over turned later last year. I doubt that that made much, if any, of an impact. There’s a lack of real analyis here.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    The “reality based community” has some explaining to do.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Oh, and to the DC versus MD/VA thing–many of the criminals who come into the district and commit crimes are from those areas.

    Wonder why they’d choose the district over MD or VA?

    Can you say “gun free zone?”

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development