Another Loss For Obama: Senate Rejects Deficit Task Force

Self-styled “deficit hawk” Kent Conrad has been pushing the creation a deficit task force for some time now. It appeared for a while that his push for the task force wouldn’t amount to much, but starting immediately after the Scott Brown win in Massachusetts, suddenly Barack Obama threw his weight behind its creation.
But the Senate still rejected the task force, indicating Obama’s waning political capital even with the members of his own party that control the Senate.

WASHINGTON – The Senate Tuesday rejected a plan backed by President Barack Obama to create a bipartisan task force to tackle the federal deficit this year despite glaring new figures showing the enormity of the red-ink threat.
The special deficit panel would have attempted to produce a plan combining tax cuts and spending curbs that would have been voted on after the midterm elections. The measure went down because anti-tax Republicans joined with Democrats who were wary of being railroaded into cutting Social Security and Medicare.
The Senate vote to kill the deficit task force came just hours after the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicted a $1.35 trillion deficit for this year as the economy continues to slowly recover from the recession.
“Yet another indication that Congress is more concerned with the next election than the next generation,” said Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., a sponsor of the plan.

Frankly, the failure to create this task force doesn’t hurt my feelings at all. Congress already has the authority to rein in deficits. In fact, the budget reconciliation process allows for deficit-reducing measures to be passed even through the Senate by a mere 50 votes instead of the usual 60.
The problem is that our political leadership in Congress just don’t use that power.
They don’t need a new task force to add another layer of bureaucracy onto the legislative process. They need to grow some backbones to use the power they have to cut spending.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array robert108

    I blame the Tea Parties; they just can’t get away with expanding govt while speaking the bait and switch BS about “deficit reduction”. Just stop taxing and spending, Dem greedheads!

  • Brent

    Judd Gregg also accepted (and then, awkwardly, declined) a silly position in Obama’s cabinet. That’s about all you really need to know about Judd.

  • farm4money

    It is not just the Tea Parties that have put the light of day on what the house, senate, and president are doing in DC. Blogs like this one and the internet in general have kept us much more informed and in an instant.

    We can not depend on the news media to do their jobs. Even 40 years ago when I worked for the third largest newspaper in ND, the news was slanted to protect the ad buyers and the politicians.

    Thank you Albert Gore JR, (son of racist Albert Gore SR) for inventing the internet. Bet your sorry you did that now.

  • sayanything-342

    Maybe obama will get thrown under his own bus yet.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Im a bit surprised this didn’t get passed; it would have provided perfect cover for Congress to say “we’re doing something about the deficits” while in fact doing nothing.

    That is surprising, but at this point our political leaders apparently don’t even care to appear as though they care about our national spending problems.

  • sayanything-4642

    “Yet another indication that Congress is more concerned with the next election than the next generation,” said Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., a sponsor of the plan.

    this douche needs to shut the fukk up. i just posted about what he said on cnbc yesterday morning. besides, its all smoke and mirrors and the public at large would know it. if they want to do something substantive, as a start they should cut spending 10% across everything and promise no increases, not even inflation, until gm pays us our money back.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    By the way, I’m done referring to “the national budget problem.” It’s not a budget problem. Budgets are about revenue and spending.

    Our national revenue is fine. We’re taxed enough as is. The problem is spending.

  • sayanything-4744

    I’m a bit surprised this didn’t get passed; it would have provided perfect cover for Congress to say “we’re doing something about the deficits” while in fact doing nothing. The panel would have releases a non-binding report on the deficit with a bunch of non-specific measures and programs that could be cut.

    They could have leveraged that come November into “we have a plan for reducing the deficit!” then quietly shelved the report after the election.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development