Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Americans Don’t Want Immigration Bill, Unions Putting Money Before The Interests Of Their Members

I never really trust the results of polls, but when the results are this lopsided it’s hard to ignore them as an indicator of the public’s opinion:

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that just 16% of American voters believe illegal immigration will decline if the Senate bill is passed. Seventy-four percent (74%) disagree. That figure includes 41% who believe the Senate bill will actually lead to an increase in illegal immigration.

So if the public at large isn’t interested in the Senate bill, why are our politicians pushing it?  Could it be because a) businesses want access to more cheap labor and b) unions want a new labor poll to unionize and collect dues from thanks to their declining enrollment numbers?  I think both of those are true, as per the support amnesty for illegal immigrants (or a guest worker program or whatever) is being pushed so hard from the left and the right.

As far as the unions go, here’s an interesting article from the Associated Press:

SANGER, Calif. - In the 1960s, farm labor leader Cesar Chavez rallied fieldhands to speak out against a guest worker program that recruited millions of Mexicans to pick crops at low wages.

Today, farmworker advocates are throwing their weight behind a proposal in the current Senate immigration bill that would bring thousands of laborers to the country’s most productive fields but offer them virtually no chance of putting down roots in the U.S.

The United Farm Workers say it is their best shot at improving working conditions in fields nationwide, and especially in California, where 92 percent of workers are foreign-born.

So the unions once opposed guest workers because it brought in low-wage workers to compete with the more highly-paid union workers, but now they support it.  Why?  Because now they can charge these workers union dues.  Forget that these low-wage workers will still compete with union workers.  Since most of the guest workers won’t be on permanent benefits, won’t get retirement plans and will work for lower wages, their existence in the labor pool is going to drive wages lower.

But that doesn’t matter to the unions, as long as they get to take their pound of flesh in the form of membership dues.

For more union double standards on illegal immigration, see the unions’ opposition to letting Mexican truck drivers cross the border.  It’s ok to oppose securing our borders so that we’re left with millions of unchecked, unscreened illegal immigrants entering the country...but letting screened Mexican citizens through the border to conduct valid commercial transactions?

That’s unconscionable.  According to union logic, anyway.

Comments

Avatar for Jamie S. Dent

I believe that Cesar E. Chavez stood for what is right. What is not right is accepting a deal on people’s lives and welfare. If you have ever drive the lands of the west, mountains or great plains, you can see the expansive lands that need to be tended too. These lands were once the lands of the Native Americans / tribal citizen and those that are Mexican.

Now 300 hundred years later, there is a debate over whether they belong in the Country. Through the logical sense, they should be allowed back into their home land. They should be allowed the same freedoms and choices as all Americans. The Guest Worker program has flaws. Recruiting more immagrants to come to this country floods our society with more illegals that refuse to return to their country. Does does not solve the illegal immigration problem. Give amnesity to ALL illegal immigrants is the right choice to make. If we are to be the world leaders, then we need to set a precedent that other nations will follow. We need to allow those willing to pick our crops the support they need to be successful. If that support is health care, better working conditions, housing, living wages or citizenship then they should receive the conditions for a safe and healthy work environment.

I do not understand how the United Farm Workers (UFW) can waiver this point. Cesar began this organization to look out for the best interest of the farm workers. It appears that politics have invaded the most socially conscious organization that stood solid on a cause. I urge the UFW to hold their position and not to waiver the lives of millions of people just to please a few rich politicians. Have them work in the fields, their position will quickly change.

Jamie S. Dent on June 1, 2007 at 10:18 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.