Alaska Republicans Still Backing Ted Stevens For Re-Election

This is what happens when party is more important than principle.

ANCHORAGE — The Alaska Republican Party on Tuesday found itself in the awkward position of urging voters to return a convicted felon to the United States Senate.
The party is pushing for the re-election of Senator Ted Stevens, who was convicted on Monday of seven felony counts but continues his campaign for a seventh full term, in the hope that his re-election will allow Republicans to hold onto his seat even if Mr. Stevens eventually resigns.
Under that chain of events, a special election would be held later to replace Mr. Stevens, giving the party the chance to find a new candidate and keep the seat out of Democratic hands.

That Stevens won’t resign his position, and abandon his campaign, in disgrace is one thing. If the law allows him to run nobody can force him not to.
But the state GOP doesn’t have to endorse him. They don’t even have to keep him as a member of the party. That they are endorsing him, and that they are allowing him to call himself a Republican, is a symptom of everything that’s wrong with both the Alaska GOP and the national GOP.
Stevens, with is big-government spending ways, isn’t a conservative. And he’s a crook to boot. If the GOP doesn’t have the cojones to kick people like Stevens out of the party how in the world can they expect the public to embrace Republicans as paragons of limited government and ethical leadership?
They can’t. Which is why the GOP is declining in America right now.
On a related note, given that Sarah Palin stood up to Stevens and that her own party in Alaska is standing behind Stevens, we can put in context some of the back-stabbing Sarah has suffered from her fellow Republicans in Alaska since joining McCain’s ticket.

Tags:


«
»
  • http://Array Teetol

    This sums the Republicans up nicely, [sic] they are dirty and corrupt to the core. Even when they are faced with the facts they cannot help but support there [sic] own, in like. [sic]

    Republican’s [sic] … the lowest common dominator [sic] of any gene pool.

    Wow. That’s a pretty well written comment. If by “Republican’s” [sic] you mean the Alaskan GOP, you are correct. However, as members of the national GOP have called on him to resign, you are wrong.

  • fishdweeb

    McCain can’t send email
    Stevens thinks the internet is a series of tubes
    Palin can see Alaska from her house.

    Your Republican Party….

  • HG

    This is what happens when party is more important than principle

    I think this applies to those who think voting for McCain could doom the party.

    Country first folks.

  • HG

    Voting for Obama certainly doesn’t advance the conservative agenda, but how does casting a party-line vote for McCain advance it?

    It doesn’t. What it does is the least amount of damage to liberty. Conservatism is not exclusively republican and judging by the past 8 years, very few elected republicans are actual conservatives. Puting party before principle is not voting for the candidate least threatening to liberty for fear it will irreparably harm the republican party.

  • ollie-B

    By the way, we conservatives are in favor of throwing the crooks out of our party.
    Wish you liberals had the same level of integrity.

    Why are they still there then? You have had 8 yrs to do it.

  • HG

    Supporting Steven’s re-election is a very stupid move.

  • Bat One

    And Sarah Palin would get to appoint the replacement? And if she is a ‘reformer’ would she dare choose a local Democrat?

    Why would anyone who is serious about political reform choose a Democrat?

  • ollie-B

    These are the same people who gave Sarah Palin a favorability rating of 80%. Makes you want to go hhuumm?!

  • Craig

    The only thing that causes me to disagree is the potential for a filibuster-proof Dem majority. The danger of that, I think, is enough for me to support Stevens, assuming that he pretty much will have to resign if he is in jail. This is especially true since Rep. Jefferson of Louisiana doesn’t seem to be going anywhere.

  • http://twitter.com/r0ckH0pp3r sayanything-3285

    If Stevens is elected, then booted by the Senate, doesn’t the Alaska Republicans get to nominate a replacement? And Sarah Palin would get to appoint the replacement? And if she is a ‘reformer’ would she dare choose a local Democrat?

  • HG

    On a related note, given that Sarah Palin stood up to Stevens and that her own party in Alaska is standing behind Stevens,

    That’s the story here IMO. Sarah’s political independence and loyalty to country couldn’t be more obvious.

  • Sting

    This sums the Republicans up nicely, they are dirty and corrupt to the core. Even when they are faced with the facts they cannot help but support there own, in like.

    Republican’s … the lowest common dominator of any gene pool.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    I think this applies to those who think voting for McCain could doom the party.

    No, it specifically doesn’t apply to people like them.

    Voting for Obama certainly doesn’t advance the conservative agenda, but how does casting a party-line vote for McCain advance it?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    These are the same people who gave Sarah Palin a favorability rating of 80%. Makes you want to go hhuumm?!

    No. This is the Alaska GOP, not the people.

    By the way, we conservatives are in favor of throwing the crooks out of our party.

    Wish you liberals had the same level of integrity.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development