Alaska Losing Oil Production, Looks To Lower Oil Taxes

Here in North Dakota we’ve been having a debate about lowering and simplifying the oil extraction tax. Unfortunately, that debate has been met with a rather short-sighted response from some who seem to be of the attitude that we should squeeze every tax dollar out of the oil companies we can before the boom ends.

Of course, there’s a smarter way to think about this. Rather than sticking it to the oil companies, why not keep our taxes in the state competitive so that the oil boom goes beyond mere “boom” and becomes a long-lasting, reliable part of our economy?

It’s a lesson Alaska is learning right now. They raised their oil taxes under Sarah Palin, something opponents of fixing North Dakota’s oil tax were quick to point out, but now Alaska is seeing a drop off in oil production as oil companies go to more competitive tax environments.

Alaska increased its oil taxes in 2007, adding a stiff escalator when oil prices rise. “Exploration just stopped,” Schafer said, and the economic falloff statewide “affected not only the oil companies but also truck drivers, seismologists, monitoring guys, work-over rigs — they all get hurt.

“Tax competitiveness is a factor in investment,” he said, and “that’s why Alaska is losing production and its ability to pay the bills. As soon as that tax increase went in, new drilling started going away.

“The point it makes for North Dakota is this: The time to do it (lower taxes) is not after production has dropped. The time to do it is when your production levels are up and you can keep it going.”

Alaska governor: Look to N. Dakota

More than 300 people attended a noon lunch Friday in Fairbanks and heard speakers say the state must lower its taxes to stop a decline in oil flowing through the trans-Alaska pipeline — down a third from its peak in 1988.

Speakers pointed to rapid drilling expansion and rising oil production in North Dakota, where 170 exploratory drill rigs are operating. No exploratory rigs are operating now on Alaska’s North Slope.

Alaska Gov. Sean Parnell, who has proposed an oil tax reduction plan, also has cited North Dakota, which ranks fourth in U.S. oil production (355,000 barrels per day and rising) while Alaska ranks third (about 600,000 barrels per day and declining).

“These are times when I see companies voting with their feet and moving to North Dakota,” Parnell said last week, according to the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner newspaper.

Some may still ask why North Dakota should lower its tax when we’re the destination of oil companies looking for more competitive tax rates. The answer, of course, is to stay competitive.

Lowering our oil extraction tax has innumerable benefits. It would make our oil play more resilient to changing market and regulatory pressures. It would also make development around the more marginal oil deposits in the state possible for a profit, something that would in turn spread the impact of oil development in the state and, in turn, spread the impact on infrastructure.

And we also need to keep in mind that the oil extraction tax isn’t the only revenue stream oil development is driving. If we cut and simplify that tax we will see a loss in revenues, but that loss will be more than made up for by increased development driving other taxes such as property, sales and income taxes.

The goal of government policy should never be to maximize revenues – we’re talking about government here, not business – but there’s no denying the positive economic impact simplifying and lowering this tax would have.

Many have written off this tax cut debate, saying the time isn’t right. They’re wrong. The time is right, because the wrong time would be to wait until our oil boom plateaus or, worse, begins to decline taking tax revenues along with it.

Rob Port is the editor of In 2011 he was a finalist for the Watch Dog of the Year from the Sam Adams Alliance and winner of the Americans For Prosperity Award for Online Excellence. In 2013 the Washington Post named SAB one of the nation's top state-based political blogs, and named Rob one of the state's best political reporters.

Related posts

  • nathan hale

    Really, the on again, off again moratorium, and the hoops that Shell and Chevron have had to jump through, the billions lost in the end, that isn’t the real problem

  • Jimmypop

    “saying the time isn’t right. They’re wrong. The time is right, because the wrong time would be to wait until our oil boom plateaus or, worse, begins to decline taking tax revenues along with it.”

    let me know when all your needs are fixed out west and you no longer need money from cass county to subsidize you and i will support your ideas of cutting taxes out there.

    also, if you come up with a concept that gives breaks to oil wholly owned companies headquartered and staffed out of north dakota i would also support that.

    currently i have ZERO inclination to support sending these needed (you folks would have us believe) dollars off to texas.

  • geelongsurgeon

    Not sure if Tax Breaks for very profitable oil corporations are the way to go here, However am open minded enough to hear other arguments. Curious here, what is the price of a barrel at the moment?

  • sbark

    Agree with N.Hale here…….its not the tax rates that shut down production in AK, but it will be a factor when Oil considers the costs to starting back up for sure……

    but Corptn in the USA have lived with high corpt tax rates and Labor costs for decades…..

    but……they cut and ran when the cost of govt was pushed to 40% by Obama, and they cut and ran when layer upon layer of punitive beuracratic obstacles were put in place—-with another 10 layers on the horizon in the form of Obamacare, Epa, animal rights etc etc…..

    Once the momentum of business is slowed, its like a train—it takes a long time to get back up to speed, best to keep it at full production in the 1st place…….this is a element of business the left just cannot comprehend living in their own little shell-game worlds……

    Liberalism is the problem, but its been fully enabled by those who should’ve been stepping up and cutting it off at the knees—and that points directly at free spending RINO wannabe intellectual Elites

  • robert108

    Generally speaking, when tax rates are lowered, the increase in volume produced will produce more revenue, something the dumb lefties never seem to get, no matter how many times it happens. They want to squeal their class warfare rhetoric about “tax breaks”, instead of doing the right thing.