Home ND News Mobile Forum Contact Reader Blogs Register Login

Friday, September 14, 2007


Alan Greenspan Unloads On Republicans Over Fiscal Principles

Alan Greenspan echoes something in a new book that I’ve been saying since the 2006 elections: Republicans lost power because they abandoned their small-government principles.

In a withering critique of his fellow Republicans, former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan says in his memoir that the party to which he has belonged all his life deserved to lose power last year for forsaking its small-government principles. . . .

Mr. Greenspan, who calls himself a “lifelong libertarian Republican,” writes that he advised the White House to veto some bills to curb “out-of-control” spending while the Republicans controlled Congress. He says President Bush’s failure to do so “was a major mistake.” Republicans in Congress, he writes, “swapped principle for power. They ended up with neither. They deserved to lose.”

Indeed they did.  With more than one poll indicating that Americans see Democrats, and not Republicans, as the party of fiscal discipline, there is little doubt that Republicans have lost their way.

Everyone is caught up with Iraq right now.  Democrats, for obvious political reasons, want to blame Iraq for the downfall of Republicans and their mouthpieces in the media are happy to go along with that.  And so are Republicans, to an extent, as they aren’t exactly keen on their abandonment of principles they still want Americans to believe they hold dear.  But I’m willing to say that the Iraq war was all but inconsequential in the 2006 elections because even if 9/11 had never happened and/or if we’d never invaded Iraq the Republicans still would have lost.

Because America elected Republicans on the principles of limited government and lower taxes, and the GOP betrayed them.

Does this tick you off? Click here to email your elected representatives right here on Say Anything, or comment below.

Comments

The Iraq War “all but inconsequential” in the 2006b elections, surely you jest?

Puzzlefeet on September 15, 2007 at 05:18 am
Rob
Rob
22123 comments
Send a private message

Not even a little bit.  I know it’s inconvenient for your political opinions, but try to follow along.

1) In 1994 the Republicans campaigned on limited government and won Congress.

2) Since 1994, Republicans have slowly departed from the role of tax-cutters and spendthrifts eventually arriving at the time of Tom DeLay and the K-street project around the turn of this century.

How long do you think Republicans could continue to ignore the principles they were elected on (even if they were paying lip service to them) and stay in the majority?

Iraq isn’t why Republicans aren’t in power.  It’s Republicans acting like Democrats.


The purpose of government shouldn’t be to do good, but simply to refrain from doing evil.

Rob on September 15, 2007 at 05:47 am

Ok, if you say so, I hope they don’t run on the Iraq war, fine by me. Don’t have to worry much about where the independents are going to swing and where they have already gone.

Puzzlefeet on September 15, 2007 at 06:34 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

If you want to ignore a fellow commenter, download this.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.