al-Sadr Tells Iraqis To Turn On US Troops

This is good news for the mission in Iraq, and a bad move for al-Sadr:

BAGHDAD – The renegade cleric Muqtada al-Sadr urged Iraqi forces to stop cooperating with the United States and told his guerrilla fighters to concentrate their attacks on American troops rather than Iraqis, according to a statement issued Sunday.
The statement, stamped with al-Sadr’s official seal, was distributed in the Shiite holy city of Najaf on Sunday — a day before a large demonstration there, called for by al-Sadr, to mark the fourth anniversary of the fall of Baghdad.
“You, the Iraqi army and police forces, don’t walk alongside the occupiers, because they are your archenemy,” the statement said. Its authenticity could not be verified.
In the statement, al-Sadr — who commands an enormous following among Iraq’s majority Shiites and has close allies in the Shiite-dominated government — also encouraged his followers to attack only American forces, not fellow Iraqis.

.
Tough words for a guy currently hiding out under the protection of the mad mullahs of Iran. It’s a desperation move, though, really. Sadr’s influence in Iraq has since his pre-surge boogie over to Iran, and his “army” is crumbling. This message is undoubtedly a bid to unite his people once again by identifying a common enemy: Americans. That might work, but I don’t see it happening while he’s still hiding under Iran’s skirts.
Sadr’s also calling on all Iraqis to turn on our troops, but I don’t see that happening either. Sadr barely has the clout to keep his own people united. That he thinks he has enough pull to turn all Iraqis against us is laughable.
The dude is marginalized. And who did that? We did it by making him beat-feet out of Iraq with a surge of troops.
That’s progress, baby. Progress.

Tags: ,


«
»
  • http://Array Neiman

    This is a perfect example of what is wrong with trying to wage a politically correct war and why President Bush’ attempts to wage/war under politically correct rules of engagement is not only incredibly stupid, it unnecessarily increases the risks to our soldiers in the field and the loss of their lives.

    al-Sadr and his gangster army were killing our troops and yet he was allowed sanctuary in a Mosque and allowed to store weapons there unopposed. If the military had been allowed to bomb that Mosque, kill al-Sadr and destroy that huge weapons cache, we would not be hearing this crap today, wherein this slimey little coward is calling for his troops, the Iraqi military and all Shiites to kill our soldiers.

    Eisenhower was almost caught in this same trap during the WW-II, when our troops were being killed in large numbers by Nazi’s shooting from a great Catholic Cathedral high on a mountain top; and everyone advised him it would be political suicide to bomb that church. Thank God he woke up and said screw that church, the soldiers there are killing our men so bomb it to hell! That is what we needed in Iraq, except that General would have been court martialled at the insistence of the Congress of the United States.

    We should never again engage in any war and as citizens we should never vote to support any war, until and unless our military is freed from such an asinine concept as political correctness. Go to war, kill everyone in our way without mercy until they stop fighting back, that is the only way to fight a war.

  • 2Hotel9

    The huge Shia demonstrations against the presence of American troops is very interesting.Especially when the banners over their heads in most pics don’t have anything to say about America. Mookie’s protesters gloomed on to the celebratory marchs that were held to commemorate the fall of Saddam. Remember Saddam? The guy that treated the Shias like,, well you know. I ain’t gonna Imus on y’all.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development