Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Sunday, October 22, 2006

Al Gore Blasts Bush’s Space Policy

I thought this reaction from Al Gore to Bush’s recently released space policy statements was interesting.

Here’s a key quote:

“Very few people have analyzed the insides of this new space policy. I urge all of you who are interested in space to analyze it very carefully. It has the potential, down the road, to create the [same] kind of fuzzy thinking and chaos in our efforts to exploit the space resource as the fuzzy thinking and chaos the Iraq policy has created in Iraq. It is a very serious mistake, in my opinion.

“We in the United States of America may claim that we alone can determine who goes into space and who doesn’t, what it’s used for and what it’s not used for, and we may claim it effectively as our own dominion to the exclusion, when we wish to exclude others, of all others. That’s hubristic.”

Put in a nutshell, Bush’s space policy states that America will support the “use of outer space by all nations for peaceful purposes.” It also states, though, that “‘peaceful purposes’ allow U.S. defense- and intelligence-related activities in pursuit of national interests.” Al Gore doesn’t like that, and I think is dislike is illustrative of common American liberal self loathing.

Setting down a space policy that leaves America with the option to use space for activities that will defend our national security and promote our foreign policy abroad just makes sense.  If we don’t use space for those goals another country will.  Pure and simple.  China has made massive advances in its space program over the last several years, and you can bet that they’ll be using space for spying and national defense missions.  If America doesn’t we’re going to be behind the curve, and that’s a dangerous place to be.

Al Gore, and liberals like him, don’t get that though.  They seem to think that if our country doesn’t “militarize space,” no other country will.  That’s an unbelievably naive position to have, but why else would they oppose promoting the use of space for American national defense?

Again, it’s liberal self loathing.  These people think America is the real problem in the world, and that if they can reign in “aggressive” American policy the world will be a better place.  Al Gore proved that point with his criticism of Bush’s space policy above, and Democrats in general have proved it when they’ve pushed for cuts in military spending and try to saddle our intelligence agencies with silly rules and regulations.  Unfortunately, while these liberals are keeping the promotion of our country’s interests in check other nations in the world are pushing to promote their interests in space and all around the globe.

Which is just one more reason why Democrats can’t be trusted with national security.

Comments

Avatar for gregdn

Part of it sounds like we intend to stop countries from developing ASAT capabilities, though perhaps I’m misreading it.

gregdn on October 22, 2006 at 11:28 am

Bless his heart! He still thinks he should be President. What a space case. Is this one of those examples of commies infiltrating the universities? ...

Zsa Zsa on October 22, 2006 at 11:33 am

I wouldn’t doubt if I looked up the word (hubristic) Al Gores name or face would be involved somewhere in the deifinition. Forgive me for being so snarky, BUT this guy conjures up memories of the hanging chads and the I secede! No I don’t! ...

Zsa Zsa on October 22, 2006 at 11:42 am

Doc...I can’t imagine anyone would really take Al Gore too seriously.

Zsa Zsa on October 22, 2006 at 12:25 pm
Avatar for jpe

What I don’t understand is why Bush had to announce this in the first place.  If you want to weaponize satellites, great, go ahead and do it.  Unless there’s some reason for the policy, it just looks obnoxious, like he’s just daring the world to do something about it.

jpe on October 22, 2006 at 02:21 pm
Avatar for jpe

On the substance of the policy, no disagreement from this quarter, docdave - but this strikes me as exactly the kind of thing that should be classified.  Making it public just seems like a big middle finger to the world.  Sometimes that’s called for, but I don’t see why it would be in the context of space policy.

jpe on October 22, 2006 at 04:22 pm

I think it would also be great to have those satellites just in case we have another attack from ManBearPig. That thing scares the shit out of me.


Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

Sparkie Arbuckle on October 23, 2006 at 02:15 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.