After The Spending Party Comes The Hang Over: Treasury Faces Balloon Payment On Debt

Our nation has been borrowing money to finance the spending spree the politicians have been on at the rate of about $1 trillion a year. And a lot of that borrowing has been done at lower rates. But now with the “stimulus” spending spree and the bailouts adding to a pile of new debt on top of the debt pile that’s been growing for decades now the Treasury is suddenly faced with making some painful payments to our creditors.
Think a balloon payment on a subprime ARM mortgage, except with a $12 trillion principle.

With the national debt now topping $12 trillion, the White House estimates that the government’s tab for servicing the debt will exceed $700 billion a year in 2019, up from $202 billion this year, even if annual budget deficits shrink drastically. Other forecasters say the figure could be much higher.
In concrete terms, an additional $500 billion a year in interest expense would total more than the combined federal budgets this year for education, energy, homeland security and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Just to inject a bit more perspective, the White House is estimating interest payments that very nearly approach the $787 billion we spent on the “stimulus” bill.
Meaning we’ll be paying the equivalent of the “stimulus” spending spree, the largest single spending bill in American history, every single year. And getting nothing for it. That’s just the interest on our debt.
What amazes me is that despite this we’re going to continue debating in the Senate a health care bill that will become another entitlement program like the out-of-control Medicare and Social Security programs. Another entitlement program the spending on which will grow faster than our economy and our wages do. Another entitlement program we simply cannot afford.
At this time we shouldn’t even be talking about new spending. We should be talking about what spending we’re going to cut so that we can start paying down the principle on this enormous amount of debt.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array Brent

    Pretty soon the annual interest will be as big as the entire federal budget was at the turn of the century.

  • http://twitter.com/evanblogs twitter-84650768

    Ah!!! I found what I was looking for. Somtimes it takes so much effort to find even tiny useful piece of information. http://bit.ly/2Lsw39

  • sayanything-9974

    Nice try – It quadrupled from January to August

  • sayanything-9974

    Yeah you are not a breeder – thank God there are any little Dino’s to deal with.

  • sayanything-203

    Fly,

    Its kinda like using shoplifting to rationalize serial killing.

  • sayanything-342

    dufus like to ignore who controlled congress back then and who ran the CRA, Freddi and Fanny into the ground. Democrats.

    And now we have an Marxist idiot in the white house.

    IMPEACH & DEPORT

  • sayanything-106

    I don’t remember anyone slambing Beck too much on this site.

  • jdkchem

    Did they try plugging the numbers into TurboTax?

  • Anon

    True last time I checked two men can not procreate.

  • sayanything-203

    Its a shame, if not altogether surprising, that NYT didn’t see fit to print a link to the referenced White House report, or any of the details such as the estimates and assumptions on which it is based. That cited $700 billion figure is almost surely bogus.

    OMB’s earlier (August) projection was for nearly $800 billion in interest payments on the federal debt in 2019. CBO meanwhile has forecast that inflation will not rise above 1.9% over the next decade, while GDP growth from 2014 thru 2019 will average higher than 4%. Both projections are optimistic in the extreme.

  • sayanything-4416

    The debt doubled from 2001 to 2007 when republicans ran everything. It had already doubled under reagan.

    The majority of the debt this country has amassed was created under reagan, bush and bush.

    Sorry folks, that’s the truth. You can kick and scream but it won’t help your kids who are screwed and stuck paying for it with their futures.

    I don’t have any! LOL!

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    And so have I.

    Glenn Beck is no prophet. I agree with him most of the time but overall I think he’s a tool.

    But that’s just my opinion.

    I don’t see why I can’t think our nations spending problems are out of control and dislike Glenn Beck.

  • sayanything-2361

    Wait, doubling in eight years is bad. QUADRUPLING in 8 months is therefore…

    I’m sorry, I lost my train of thought.

  • millipo21

    Would you like to install a temporary office on my diary?

    regards
    ginney
    ______________________________________________
    pet potty | indoor dog potty | dog potty grass | pet potty | dog potty grass | permanent hair removal at home | best hair removal product | permanent hair removal system | natural hair removal | hair natural removal | natural hair removal | hair natural removal

  • bikebubba

    Um, Dino, you DO know that when the government tries to borrow a boatload of money (a huge deficit), that moves the demand curve for loanable money “up” and hence the market clearing price, right? In that way, a deficit will tend to move interest rates out of proportion to its impact on the debt.

  • mplsbob

    And this site criticizes Glenn Beck. He has been talking about this for months.

  • sayanything-4253

    And please refresh our memory as to what has happened since the Dems took over?

    Obviously the debt has gone down right?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    I took a shot at him yesterday. I think he’s getting a little too carried away.

    And some apparetnly think that makes me a liberal.

  • sayanything-2361

    See that equivalence argument a lot, Bat. ‘Christians sent a milquetoast letter to someone for urinating on a painting of Christ. It’s absolutely the same as rape, beheadings, child rape, slavery, stonings and mass murder. Worse actually.’

  • sayanything-4416

    Typical mouth-breathing conservative doesn’t understand the difference between deficit and debt.

    Makes arguing with you a lot like watering a dead plant.

    President McCain Would Have A Huge Deficit Too

    If one goes through the March update (pp. 6-7) and the August update (pp. 52-53) and adds up all the changes to the January estimate, you find that the deficit increase since January consists of $46 billion in lower than expected revenues due to the economy (11.5%), $129 billion in higher spending due to technical re-estimates (32.2%), and $226 billion due to legislative changes to both spending and revenues (56.3%).

    This suggests that we would have had a deficit of at least $1,361 billion this year even if McCain had won (January deficit plus lower revenues and technical changes and no legislative changes) … assuming no stimulus and that the economy would have performed as well without it.

    That’s only 14% less than the deficit currently projected. some of the legislative changes are due to higher defense spending and other non-stimulus related programs.

    If we assume that McCain’s stimulus would have been half the size of Obama’s that leaves us with an estimated deficit of $1,474 billion under McCain–only 7% less than the deficit now estimated.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development