Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Sunday, September 24, 2006

Ad Agencies Being Coerced Into Recruiting Minorities

Is this really necessary?

NEW YORK - Why, city officials demanded, were there virtually no black staffers at New York’s elite advertising agencies? The year was 1968. Agencies’ executives vowed to fix the problem. They didn’t. Now, under steady pressure from advocates and the threat of public embarrassment by city officials, they’ve renewed those promises.

Sixteen of the city’s top ad agencies have agreed to recruit more minorities, especially blacks. They’ll also diversify senior management and let city officials monitor them for three years.

As Advertising Week 2006 festivities begin, the agreements signed with the city’s Human Rights Commission offer a rare glimpse inside one of New York’s core industries — and reveal that its work force doesn’t look much like the nation.

“This is a big deal — that advertising agencies actually signed written agreements to make these changes,” said Burtch Drake, president of the American Association of Advertising Agencies. “Will you see an overnight sea change? No. But over time you’ll see other cultures integrated into advertising.”

Seems to me that all this pressure is going to do is force these agencies to factor in race when making hiring decisions.  Meaning that if it choosing between two candidates for a job opening comes down between a minority person and a non-minority person (read: white male) the minority person is going to get the nod because of his/her skin color and a desire by the employer to adhere to politically correct standards for diversity in the work place.  Which, to me, is every bit as disgusting as not hiring a minority because of his/her skin color.  Or gender or religion or whatever.

I mean that.  Hiring a person because of their skin color is every bit as reprehensible as refusing to hire a person because of their skin color.

Comments

Avatar for robert108

Right Rob, either way, it’s discrimination on the basis of skin color.  For the left, their aversion to racism has never been about principle; it’s just another weapon to use against America.  Racism for cause is simply racism.  All those southern racists feel that they have a good reason to be racist, too, but they don’t have the political power to enforce their racist views on the rest of us.  The leftie racists do have that power, and they use it.

robert108 on September 24, 2006 at 08:20 pm

This is just more racism in support of the useless “diversity” requirement and more word tricks by equating the color of skin to “culture”.

Note to the supporters: hire the best man or woman for the job. I know,..I know,..that’s such a radical concept.

I’ll let you get back to your bean-counting now.

likwidshoe on September 24, 2006 at 09:16 pm

I would refuse to hire an agency that promoted racism.


[W]hat you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on September 25, 2006 at 03:28 am

It’s funny in that my impression is that the NY ad agencies were on the cutting edge of eliminating sexism in big business.


[W]hat you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on September 25, 2006 at 03:32 am
Avatar for Mickey

Welcome to the machine. I’ve seen jobs created to fill the EOE requirements.

Mickey on September 25, 2006 at 03:51 am

Lucky for you otherwise a guy that wears Mickey Mouse ears would likely never get a job.


[W]hat you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on September 25, 2006 at 03:56 am
Avatar for Mickey

This is my corporate uniform

Mickey on September 25, 2006 at 04:18 am
Avatar for susan

What ever happened to hiring the “best” candidate, no matter what color their skin is?

This subject really gets my goat.

susan on September 25, 2006 at 04:33 am

What ever happened to hiring the “best” candidate, no matter what color their skin is?

That went out when the pinheads in government, academia, and liberal circles decided that the best way to fight racism against some groups was to enforce racism against other groups. The justification given is that “past historical injustices” now warrent rewarding people, and by contrast punishing others, who had nothing to do with the past racism. Overlooked in all of this is the simple logic that now new groups are being favored as well as discriminated against which means that the cycle will never end.

This is the liberal solution. Turn yourself upside down, invert common sense and logic, and it may make just a little bit of sense.

America calls it “affirmative” action while some European countries actually have the gall to call it “positive discrimination”.

likwidshoe on September 25, 2006 at 04:39 am

This is a great opportunity for the eligible white candidate(s) to sue..

anonomisly on September 25, 2006 at 12:39 pm

Excuse me, but aren’t the minorities becoming the MAJORITY already? Then they should be able to get themselves the skills they need instead of claiming that they have a disadvantage. There’s plenty of “disadvantaged” people from every group.

student student on September 25, 2006 at 02:50 pm
Avatar for ellinas

How does one repay for past sins?
While I don’t agree with affirmative action/reverse discrimination I have not heard any solutions to the problem of racism. Why don’t you guys propose a equitable solution to all involved? Should the descendants of those that benefited from slavery, be made to pay? If not why? If yes Why?

ellinas on September 25, 2006 at 03:14 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.