80% Of Those Who Voted For Obama Support Legal Concealed Carry Of Firearms

That was not a typo, nor an exageration. Overall, 83% of voters favor concealed carry.
Oh.  My.

Zogby/O’Leary Poll Reveals Majority of Voters Will Oppose Senators Who Vote to Confirm an Anti-Second Amendment Supreme Court Nominee
Strong Majority of Independents, Democrats and Obama Voters Support the Right to Carry a Firearm

…Judge Sotomayor does not believe the Second Amendment right to “keep and bear arms” and the right to self-defense are fundamental rights of all Americans. Specifically, Judge Sotomayor believes the Second Amendment only applies to the federal government and does not apply to the States, as indicated by her recent testimony and past rulings.
Zogby/O’Leary asked voters:
“Would you support or oppose a U.S. Senator who voted to confirm a Justice to the U.S. Supreme Court who does not believe in the right to keep and bear arms and the right to self-defense?”
Fifty-two percent of American voters would oppose the re-election of any Senator who votes to confirm a Supreme Court nominee who does not believe in the right to keep and bear arms. Only 26 percent of voters would support such a Senator.
Among Independent voters, 57 percent would oppose such a Senator, and only 17 percent would support. Forty-nine percent of young voters (age 18-29) would oppose a Senator who votes to confirm a nominee who does not believe Second Amendment rights apply to all Americans, and just 31 percent would support such a Senator. A plurality of Hispanic voters (42 percent) would oppose such a Senator, and only 28 percent would support. A large percentage of Hispanics (30 percent) are not sure. A majority of union members (54 percent) would also oppose, and 29 percent would support.
The Right to Carry a Firearm
An amendment that would have permitted law-abiding gun owners with concealed-carry permits to carry their firearms across state lines recently fell short in the Senate. Although the amendment received a majority of votes (58-39), a filibuster-proof 60 votes were required for passage.
Zogby/O’Leary asked voters:
“Currently, 39 states have laws that allow residents to carry firearms to protect themselves, only if they pass a background check and pay a fee to cover administrative costs. Most of those states also require applicants to have firearms safety training. Do you support or oppose this law?”
An overwhelming majority of Americans (83 percent) support concealed-carry laws, while only 11 percent oppose them. A majority of Independent voters (86 percent), Democrats (80 percent), young voters age 18-29 (83 percent), Hispanic voters (80 percent), and those who voted for President Obama (80 percent) support the right to carry a firearm.

The sub-headline is too modest.  80% of voters cannot agree as to whether a tomato is a fruit or a vegetable.  83% is an overwhelming majority.
That, ladies and gentlemen, is a sea change in public opinion.
Hat Tip: Say Uncle by way of Glen “Instapundit” Reynolds.

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • Buzz

    Who the fuck wouldn't with all the spooks, beaners, and rednecks carrying?

    (Thats a free one post at will).

  • ellinas

    WARNING

    Rodney Graves is incapable of civil debate. He is known to threaten people with physical harm, is a known bigot and is the bully of this blog.

    WARNING

  • robert108

    …incapable of civil debate…

    ellinas on August 4, 2009 at 08:28 pm

    Little e's self description, in his own words.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    This is one debate that is over.

    80% of voters can't agree as to tomatoes being a fruit or a vegetable.

  • docdave

    WARNING

    None of e's crappy comments are worth reading….

    WARNING

  • http://www.cometranch.com/ Asi Picante

    I carry and I am neither a spook, beaner or redneck..

  • budsmoke

    80% Of Those Who Voted For Obama Support Legal Concealed Carry Of Firearms

    Maybe those 80% understand the consequences of blind-faith…

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    Rodney Graves is incapable of civil debate. He is known to threaten people with physical harm, is a known bigot and is the bully of this blog.

    Wait. Wth? Rodney is probably the least bigoted person on the board and gets riled up over even the smallest sign of racism.

    Completely unfair E.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    pussycat,

    I'm glad the hostages are free.

    I'm disgusted with the statement agreed to, and deeply concerned as to what else may have been promised.

    You remain a dishonest fuck.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    D'oh.

  • conundrum

    Isn't it just plain weird that anyone on this board wants a FEDERAL LAW allowing conceal carry across state lines. You know the only way that is going to happen is if you standardize the process to get a carry and conceal thus letting the Feds have a say in your life.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    conundrum,

    If states are required to recognize each others drivers licenses (an issue not addressed by the Constitution), why would you set a higher bar for an enumerated right, especially given that the 14th Amendment was specifically intended to extend the Bill of Rights such that the States could not abridge them?

  • conundrum

    obviously you can kill or be killed by both but it is really tough to conceal a car.

    I just find it odd that most on this board are for states rights over federal rights, local over state and individual over local. The libertarian philosophy. Why would you want to get the Feds involved.. I personally think that you should be able to carry and conceal as long as there is a high standard, as in standardized testing, for training and receiving your carry and conceal.

  • sayanything-6955

    Lindsey Grahamnesty needs to be "concealed and carried" the fuck away!! This scotus nominee should never have made it out of committee. Lock and load folks.

  • http://savvysponds.co.uk/ Jessica

    The criteria to qualify for carrying a firearm should be made more stringent. A single background check and small fee isn't enough to separate those who are eligible to carry a firearm from those who aren't!

  • Mickey

    Rodney Graves is incapable of civil debate. He is known to threaten people with physical harm, is a known bigot and is the bully of this blog.

    That comment was so gay that it was dino gay.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Jessica,

    Who are you to hinder someone else's Constitutionally enumerated right?

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    Isn't it just plain weird that anyone on this board wants a FEDERAL LAW allowing conceal carry across state lines. You know the only way that is going to happen is if you standardize the process to get a carry and conceal thus letting the Feds have a say in your life.

    I don't agree with this the second amendment states that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed upon. I don't see what all the confusion is? If my drivers liscense works in another state my conceal to carry permit should as well.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    80% Of Those Who Voted For Obama Support Legal Concealed Carry Of Firearms

    That makes no sense at all to me.

  • conundrum

    I would think that this is a perfect opportunity for NRA. They have teaching and conceal and carry programs. Develop a nationwide one.

  • sayanything-4625

    The criteria to qualify for carrying a firearm should be made more stringent. A single background check and small fee isn't enough to separate those who are eligible to carry a firearm from those who aren't!

    "What part of Congress shall make no law" or "Shall not be infringed" are you missing? You realize that under the American theory of government your rights were given to you by God and those are rights that can't be taken away by government? Government is supposed to exist to protect your rights not limit or take them away.

  • sayanything-4625

    I just find it odd that most on this board are for states rights over federal rights, local over state and individual over local. The libertarian philosophy. Why would you want to get the Feds involved.. I personally think that you should be able to carry and conceal as long as there is a high standard, as in standardized testing, for training and receiving your carry and conceal.

    I am for my rights. Concealed carry is an individual right. Why should New York be able to hinder my right to self defense?

  • http://www.bikebubba.blogspot.com/ Bike Bubba

    Jessica, the ugly reality of the matter is that the group LEAST likely to shoot someone with no good reason would be carry permit holders. Police officers shoot far more innocents, and so do those who do not have a carry permit.

    The system is working pretty well, and it reduces crime. Why on earth would you want to further encumber the exercise of a right acknowledged in the Constitution?

    I guess I ought to ask those people who advocate shall issue concealed carry, but nevertheless voted for a gun banner like Obama, shouldn't I?

  • 2Hotel9

    Well, well, well. Why would all those Obambi supporters be so fearful of the government that they would want the right to keep and bear arms? What do they have to fear?!?!?

  • AR-15

    80% Of Those Who Voted For Obama Support Legal Concealed Carry Of Firearms

    Totally baffling! These people support CCW and they voted for a man who looks down his nose at our 2nd Amendment rights http://www.gunbanobama.com/Default.aspx?NavGuid=5… and gun owners in general. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTxXUufI3jA

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development