Say Anything Blog

Expect the LATimes to release a heavily edited PG version of it.

And before you even start Hannitized, I know I know I know… it’s not important, the American people only want to hear and care about the issues like the one Obama has credibility in based on the polls: the economy, blah blah just another desperate attack from the BUSHMCCAINDRUDGEBLOGFOX Media, I get it so shut the f$&@ up.

I am just floored that any Catholics or Jews could possibly vote for this man! Surely they know by now his pro-Palestinian views, his votes on abortion. I don’t see how you can just sweep this under the rug. Your political leanings should take a back seat to your morals.

http://briefingroom.thehill.com/2008/10/29/reward-of-175000-offered-for-lat-obama-tape/

hit thehill.com

$150,000?!
HELL NO!
THat would put me in a “nailed-by-obama” tax bracket!
It would cost me more in the long run!

Without an honest exchange of ideas, how can a mind grow?

Hey how about getting some citizens together and picketing the LA Times chanting “Free the tape!!!!!”

Grimaldi from Monaco? The ruling family of Monaco go by the last name Grimaldi. A little international intrigue?

Yes it could be a waste of money because you would probably get an edited version, with the anti-Semitic statements cut out, or it would not show Obama giving a toast to Rashid Khalidi, that he is supposed to have given.  I think the fear the Jewish people have about him, is greater with them imagining what might have been said at the event. 

However if it is true and full-blown, it could be very damaging and cost Obama enough Jewish vote to lose Florida and Pennsylvania

American Dog

LA Times has a problem of having a weak spine.  Sure, let Joe take the heat and have his life harrassed for asking a question.  The question was not the problem, the answer was.  It revealed yet another truth about Obama.  So Obama embarrassed himself by the clear truth. Let’s take a look a more reality.  The LA TImes is now agreeable to participate in harboring information this country is entitled to know to make the best decision possible for the highest postion in our Nation.
I resnt LA Times apparent postion is that they too have a right to politically manipulate this country against it’s will.

Anyone who can toast with the PLO has to be the enemy of our country. BO is an honest true blue Muslim. He can’t hide it, can’t change it, or mix words and lie about it.

Anyone who can toast with the PLO has to be the enemy of our country. BO is an honest true blue Muslim. He can’t hide it, can’t change it, or mix words and lie about it.

Harry on October 30, 2008 at 06:51 am

No. Not realy. Anyone that can toast with the PLO has a different world view than you. Simple as that.

Present members of the PLO include:

Fatah - Largest faction, social democratic/nationalist.
The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) - Second largest, radically militant and Communist
The Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP) - Third largest, Communist
The Palestinian People’s Party (PPP) - Ex-Communist, non-militant.
The Palestine Liberation Front (PLF, Abu Abbas faction) - Minor left-wing faction.
The Arab Liberation Front (ALF) - Minor faction, aligned to the Iraqi Ba’ath Party.
As-Sa’iqa - Syrian-controlled Ba’athist faction.
The Palestine Democratic Union (Fida) - Minor left-wing faction, non-militant
The Palestinian Popular Struggle Front (PPSF, Samir Ghawsha faction) - minor left-wing faction.
The Palestinian Arab Front (PAF) - minor faction.

No. Not realy. Anyone that can toast with the PLO has a different world view than you. Simple as that.

- Ellinas

You’re exactly right, anyone that does sit down with Communist/Leftist terror organizations does have different world view. They support terrorism. You support terrorism. Simple as that.

Funny how the lie has evolved from ‘the video doesn’t exist’ to ‘if it does it’s meaningless’ to ‘Obama disagreed with al Khalidi’ and now it’s ‘anyone who does toast al Khalidi just has a different world view’. The truth can’t be that far off now, like the day after the election is over.

Ellinas
You’re exactly right, anyone that does sit down with Communist/Leftist terror organizations does have different world view. They support terrorism. You support terrorism. Simple as that.

Bullwinkle on October 30, 2008 at 09:40 am

Nixon sat with the Chinese, Reagan sat with the Soviets, Rumsfeld sat with Saddam, G.W Bush sat with the Russians and Chinese. I can go on and on. You make no sense.

Funny how the lie has evolved from ‘the video doesn’t exist’ to ’if it does it’s meaningless’ to ‘Obama disagreed with al Khalidi’ and now it’s ‘anyone who does toast al Khalidi just has a different world view’. The truth can’t be that far off now, like the day after the election is over.

Bullwinkle on October 30, 2008 at 09:45 am

Your worlview is very limited.

Your worlview is very limited.

No counterargument, I see.  Typical.

If govt control of the economy were the way to go, the Soviet Union would be the richest, most powerful nation in the history of the world.

Thanks to Obama, America remains the only country where it is illegal to drill our own oil!

If The L.A Times as they say are binded by an agreement not to release the tape, in the interest of journalism why not a transcript of it. They in fact endorse obama and know full well if they release the tape or any information on content showing obama nodding laughing and applauding antisemetic jokes and praising the plo spokesman, would end his political career. Obama has a proven track record of associating with anti-Isreal and antisemetic characters. OBAMA REMAINS SILENT

Your worldview is very limited.

No counterargument, I see.  Typical.

robert108 on October 30, 2008 at 10:59 am

Robert thank you for your observation.