10 Senate Republicans Join Democrats To Keep Pork In Spending Bill
Sigh…
WASHINGTON – Members of both parties Monday voted to keep their cherished home-state projects as the Senate resumed debate on a spending bill covering foreign aid and domestic agency budgets. By a 63-32 vote, lawmakers rejected a bid by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., to effectively strip about 8,000 of those earmarks from the $410 billion measure.
“If the president really wants to change Washington, as soon as this bill reaches his desk, he should veto it and send it back and say, ‘Clean it up,’” McCain said. . . .
The 1,132-page spending bill awards big increases to domestic programs and is stuffed with pet projects. The measure wraps together nine spending bills to pay for the annual operating budgets of every Cabinet department except for the departments of Defense, Homeland Security and Veterans Affairs.
The bill has 7,991 pet projects totaling $5.5 billion, according to calculations by the GOP staff of the House Appropriations Committee.
Here are the Republicans who voted in favor of the $5.5 billion in pork:
Alexander (R-TN)
Bond (R-MO)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Roberts (R-KS)
Shelby (R-AL)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)
Wicker (R-MS)
$5.5 billion in pork isn’t a lot compared to some of the wasteful spending we’ve seen already in the dawn of the Obama administration, but it’s more than just the spending. It’s the fact that these people put buttering the bread of their big-money contributors back home above sound policy. Earmarks aren’t the most pressing spending concern in Congress, but they’re a corrupting influence.
Until Republicans can be counted on to offer Americans something that’s distinctly different from what Democrats are offering, they’re going to remain the minority problem.
If Republicans say limited government, they should mean limited government.



