108 Billion Dollar International Monetary Fund Bailout Flying Under the Radar!
We don’t have the money!
Angry Republicans on Capitol Hill are charging House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California with putting the interests of international lending organizations ahead of the needs of U.S. troops in the field.
Democrats in the House have put supplemental legislation to support troops in Iraq and Afghanistan on hold as they try to round up the votes they need to put a $108 billion global bailout of the International Monetary Fund onto this piece of “must pass” legislation.
We are already running a deficit that dwarfs any deficit we’ve already had. And now the Democrats at Obama’s request plan on sticking us with ANOTHER $108 Billion of debt.
They know it’s not popular so they are going to try to attach it to a troop funding bill. As unconscionable as that is, they are holding up the troop funding bill because they don’t have the votes to attach this right now.
We’ve got enough problems with the way Obama and his Democrat cronies in the Congress are running things. Why in the world are we giving money to a dysfunctional IMF that is known for underwriting thugs all over the world?
Why make this worse?
One idea, one bill.
Until that is passed, nothing should surprise anyone.
Bumbling Obama will just change the subject, like so: I created or saved 600,000 jobs!
Being Obama is easy.
1. Ignore the subject.
2. Look stupid.
3. Laugh at inopportune times.
4. Make some shit up.
5. Sit back and watch as the “reality based” dipshits line up in support.
6. Profit from the economic death of a country.
This same kind of shit was pulled in California. Look at their debt now. They are begging the US government and the citizens for help. Get rid of a majority of the waste of sperm Mexicans who are draining the system and the loss is reduced drastically.
Why? Because they can. That is what they think government is for. To do because you can, what you will and what you can get away with. They accuse Republicans of it because in their mind that being the entire function of government, then anyone in power must be by definition doing that. Therefore, it is simply a matter of motivation and reason.
They think they are better and nobler. They tell us so all the time. Then they do whatever they want to and the people let them,
Why should they not? Constitution? Meaningless as no one believes in it and those who do not enough and not in the right way.
Without proper principle, without a sense of right and wrong, AND a will to follow it through, the public will agree with this as being the way of things and keep allowing it. To do this they must believe that their morals and ethics being applied to the society is right to do. Convincing them that no one’s sense of right and wrong has a place in telling others what to do is counterproductive for if you accept that, then the alternative is that no sense of right and wrong enters into it.
In short, they see it all as a game of thieves and gamblers they’re not even sitting in at.