Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Saturday, January 28, 2006

The Steve Kubby Fiasco

I just stumbled across this story about marijuana activist Steve Kubby being arrested on drug charges in California after returning to the U.S. from Canada to turn himself in. He had appealed to the Candian government for permission to remain in that country, but his appeals were denied.

Apparently this is quite a bit of controversy surrounding Mr. Kubby. His name is currently the top search on Technorati. A lot of people are angry about his arrest. You see, Kubby is not just a marijuana activist (and Libertarian politician). He also suffers from a form of adrenal cancer, which is currently in remission. Marijuana, or a medical derivative of the drug, is part of his treatment for that. Currently Kubby is in jail and, according to the reporting I've found on the story, isn't receiving this medication.

Not can't speak to the validity of Kubby's claims about the medicinal properties of the drug, but I can tell you that his situation doesn't do much to raise my opinion of this silly "war" we're fighting against marijuana.

Now don't get me wrong. I'm not one of these people who advocate for the legalization of all drugs. I would vigourously oppose any attempt to make substances like meth or crack cocaine legal, but when it comes to the relatively benign marijuana I just don't see the point in opposing it any more. We are spending billions every year opposing this drug, and for what? To keep Americans from experiencing a high that is, for all practical purposes, not all that much different from the buzz they can legally obtain from alcohol?

Every year we put hundreds of thousands of people in jail on marijuana charges, the vast majority of them simply for possessing the drug. Yet simultaneously we let thousands of high-risk sex offenders, captured illegal aliens and other types of criminals back out into our communities every year, all because our prisons are overcrowded. Is anyone else thinking that we have our priorities backwards here? I don't know about the rest of you, but I'd rather put the potheads back on the street and keep the sex perverts in jail.

Does marijuana have medical properties? I don't know. But I can tell you that our "war" on the drug seems like a losing battle to this observer. I say we cut our losses, stop harrassing people like Mr. Kubby, and focus on some of the more important threats which are facing this country.

Comments

Avatar for Jake

I agree wth you, but too bad that the right wing phacist Xtians, who support Bush, have to be such puritan pigs!

Jake on January 28, 2006 at 07:02 pm
Rob
Rob
18459 comments
Send a private message

Well, even it is used solely as a pain killer that seems legitimate enough to me.

Jake:

I agree wth you, but too bad that the right wing phacist Xtians, who support Bush, have to be such puritan pigs!

I’m a right-wing Bush supporter, yet I also support the legalization of marijuana.

Maybe you shouldn’t stereotype people.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on January 28, 2006 at 08:01 pm
Avatar for Chad Evans

Marijuana doesn’t have any medicinal value that is known.  To many cancer patients, marijuana is used to help alleviate any pain or discomfort, but it doesn’t help kill cancer cells or any of your body’s cells which are vital to being killed to put someone into remission.

Chad Evans on January 28, 2006 at 08:02 pm
Avatar for graemea

I agree with you rob. If both sides come together and pressure congress we can stop the unjust war on cheeba. Most on the left agree with ending the war on marijuana. I have seen some on the right talk about it also.

We would have to take on the christian right and maybe a tiny minority on the left, but I think it is possible.

graemea on January 28, 2006 at 11:01 pm
Avatar for Marty

I’ll never understand why “the majority of americans who do not support legalizing pot” can be so carelessly demonized as “the Christian Right”.

Americans come in many flavors, many religions, and by and large, they oppose the legalization of pot. 

I’m a Christian, a Bush supporter, and i oppose legalization of pot—but not for any religious reasons.  I think the bible is silent on the matter.

Some people will use any meritless excuse to assault my religios beliefs, it seems.

Marty on January 29, 2006 at 09:02 am
Avatar for likwidshoe

Jake spits, ...the right wing phacist Xtians...

What the hell does that even mean? I think Jake has nasty case of diarrhea of the mouth. Shit just keeps pouring out of it.

likwidshoe on January 29, 2006 at 09:02 am
Avatar for Seth Williams

I’m a right-wing Christian Bush supporter, and I support the legalization of pot. So, Jake, your little rant is a bit out of tune with reality. People on both sides of the political divide support the legalization of it, and people on both sides oppose it. I’ve never seen it as a partisan issue.

Seth Williams on January 29, 2006 at 10:01 am
Avatar for Jake

Okay, maybe I went too far. But the conservatives can have it both ways: they can’t cry about their guns and taxes, then say they don’t mind the gov’t snooping in or testing them.

Jake on January 30, 2006 at 01:01 pm
Avatar for Marty

Oh why not?  Why aren’t we conservatives allowed to have political positions that seem inconsistent to outsiders like everyone else? 

Just as an example (since i don’t know your position on these matters—although i might guess):

Almost all of my liberal freinds support killing the innocent (abortion), but oppose killing the obviously guilty (capital punishment).  And almost all of my conservative friends are the exact opposite:  we’d much rather kill the guilty scumbag who has proven his uselessness to the human race, than the innocent child who is nothing but pure potential.

The funny thing is, everytime i’ve offered to abandon my support for the death penalty, if my liberal friend would abandon his support for abortion—i get no takers.  Zip.  Nada.

Yes, we are all allowed to look like hypocrites to everyone else.  We’re all pretty good at it too.  rasberry

Marty on January 30, 2006 at 02:01 pm
Avatar for Jake

Isn’t the whole modern con movement, the part which attracted me the most, based on getting gov’t out of the snooping business?

Jake on February 10, 2006 at 12:38 pm
Rob
Rob
18459 comments
Send a private message

The conservative movement is about shrinking government down to only bare essentials.  Some conservatives consider certain types of snooping to be a bar essential.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on February 11, 2006 at 09:44 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.