Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Thursday, January 26, 2006

The Thin Green Line

This Pentagon report has been getting a significant amount of attention in the media.


WASHINGTON (AP) — Stretched by frequent troop rotations to Iraq and Afghanistan, the Army has become a "thin green line" that could snap unless relief comes soon, according to a study for the Pentagon.


Andrew Krepinevich, a retired Army officer who wrote the report under a Pentagon contract, concluded that the Army cannot sustain the pace of troop deployments to Iraq long enough to break the back of the insurgency. He also suggested that the Pentagon's decision, announced in December, to begin reducing the force in Iraq this year was driven in part by a realization that the Army was overextended.


The idea that our military is being "worn out" by their mission in Iraq is certainly one worthy of attention and study, but I'm not sure things are nearly as bad as they're being made to seem by the media.


For one thing, while new enlistment rates are down for the military re-enlistment rates have been exceeding goals. Soldiers signing up for additional tours of duty after they have already completed the required amount of service is hardly an indication of a dispirited or broken force.


For another, the article mentions that our military will not be able to sustain deployments to Iraq long enough to "break the back" of the insurgency. It has often been suggested by myself and others on this blog that defeating the insurgency has never really been the primary goal in Iraq. At least not an outright military defeat, anyway. Rather, the goal has always been to leave Iraq with a democratic government capable of defending itself from the insurgency. Once that goal has been completed the vast majority of our troops will be able to come home.


Indeed, some of our troops are already coming home thanks to the improvement in Iraqi security forces.


So while Mr. Krepinevich's report makes some excellent points it can hardly be concluded that our military is "broken," which is a conclusion many in the media and on the left will try to make with this report as evidence.

Comments

Avatar for Chief RZ

Doug,
More politics, as usual. 
Air Force Times:  The Air Force will shed 55,000 in the next few years.

Chief RZ on January 26, 2006 at 08:01 am
Avatar for Doug Purdie

I keep hearing the mantra, “we are stretched too thin.”

We have about 2 million US men and women in the ranks of our military institutions.  We have about 165,000 troops currently in Iraq and Afganistan.  That amounts to 12% of our total forces currently engaged in conflict.  Are the other 88% really so useless?  We deployed 500,000 in Gulf War I, with nary a Chicken Little to be heard from, so how is it that 1/3 that amount is taxing our capacity?

In WWII we fought on three simultaneous fronts: North Africa/Southern Europe, Western Europe and Asia Pacific.  Today’s US military is better trained and equiped, yet to some it is incapable of maintaining a single front against a weaker enemy.  Heck, we lost more than twice as many heroes in that war than we currently have deployed in the ME.

OK, I’ll go read the article, but I’m skeptical that it will answer my question.

Doug Purdie on January 26, 2006 at 08:01 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.