Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Friday, December 09, 2005

Conservative Blogs Are Better

Interesting...

NEW YORK In an argument sure to be challenged in certain sectors of the blogosphere, a story in The New York Times magazine coming up this Sunday declares that conservative blogs continue to best liberal blogs in political and electoral influence.

The title of the piece by Michael Crowley in the magazine’s 5th Annual Year in Ideas cover package says it all: “Conservative Blogs Are More Effective.”

Crowley, a New Republic writer, claims that with the 2006 elections approaching, Democrats are now “trying to use blogs more strategically.” But he concludes by embracing the view of Matt Stoller, an activist who ran a blog for Sen. Jon Corzine during his 2005 race for governor of New Jersey, who believes that next year conservative bloggers “will certain have an upper hand.” Crowley adds: “Again.”


I'm not sure I'd say that right-leaning bloggers dominate because they're "better" or use their blogging "more strategically." There are plenty of very talented and thoughtful people on the left who deserve to have their opinions considered. Rather, I think it has more to do with the fact that politicians on the right are just plain easier to support right now.

The war in Iraq, and the myriad of issues surrounding it from torture to intelligence, is the biggest issue in the land. While the Republicans have mostly been consistent on the war the left has espoused a litany of positions ranging from "We're losing, pull out now!" to "We can win, but Bush is doing everything wrong."

It is hard to get behind a moving target, and it is also hard to be taken seriously when its clear that your side is playing politics while the other side is trying to win a war.

Having over-the-top, hard-left demagogues like Howard Dean, Michael Moore, Al Franken and Cindy Sheehan as some of your most recognized spokesman doesn't exactly help either. These people routinely distract from more serious issues with their vicious rhetoric and childish antics.

Neither side is perfect, but right now the Republicans are getting it mostly right on the biggest facing this country while the collective left busies themselves with new and creative of insulting the President.

That's why the right-leaning bloggers are being taken more seriously.

Comments

Avatar for modern instances

Having over-the-top, hard-left demagogues like Howard Dean, Michael Moore, Al Franken and Cindy Sheehan as some of your most recognized spokesman doesn’t exactly help either. These people routinely distract from more serious issues with their vicious rhetoric and childish antics.

Yeah, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Rev. Phelps, and Tom DeLay are much more reasonable and focus on the facts.

Conservative blogs are more effective because they parrot the talking points so well.

modern instances on December 10, 2005 at 01:13 pm
Avatar for Say Anything - North Dakota’s Most Popular P

[...] That New York Times piece about conservative blogs being “better” than liberal I posted about on Friday is up now. [...]

Rob
Rob
19965 comments
Send a private message

Last time I checked Coulter, while a wench, wasn’t pushing anti-semitic rhetoric or engaging in conspiracy theories about the President’ planing 9/11.

And Fred Phelps is a Democrat.

Conservative blogs are more effective because we’re fact driven, not emotion driven.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on December 11, 2005 at 12:12 pm
Avatar for Andrew

I’m not sure I’d say that right-leaning bloggers dominate because they’re “better” or use their blogging “more strategically.”

I definately would say that Conservative blogs are “better”.  On average, I find the formats of Conservative blogs to be much more user-friendly.  I’d read a lot more lefty blogs if I could find some with as good of format as this one for instance.

Conservative blogs are more effective because we’re fact driven, not emotion driven.

Interesting observation.  There are many people on both sides that seem to be emotionally driven, however I agree with you that your average Conservative blogger relies more heavily on rational thought and factual evidence.  But then again, as a Republican, I don’t know how much of that is really just my bias.

Andrew on December 11, 2005 at 01:13 pm
Rob
Rob
19965 comments
Send a private message

There are many people on both sides that seem to be emotionally driven, however I agree with you that your average Conservative blogger relies more heavily on rational thought and factual evidence.

I once hear it put this way: “Conservative think things.  Liberals feel things.” While that has exceptions, obviously, I think its pretty accurate.

Consider some popular leftists positions. 

Spending cuts: “They want to starve the poor/make kids stupider!”

Cutting taxes: “They just want Paris Hilton to be able to afford another yacht!”

The war in Iraq: “Its a war for Jews/Halliburton/oil!”

None of these positions are founded in fact, but rather a distorted observations of the facts as filtered through an emotional rejection of conservative philosophies, among other things.

I’ve said a few times on this blog that what we recognize as modern liberalism today is slowly going to marginalize itself (as the aging hippies who make up its key demographic die off) and a new left/right divide will emerge among the people who make up the political right.  As modern liberals fade out, so-called “south park” Republicans/libertarians will become more disillusioned with being lumped in with “social conservatives,” who tend to be more authoritarian in their views.

Frankly, I think it will be a healthier division for America.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on December 11, 2005 at 02:12 pm
Avatar for Andrew

I’ve said a few times on this blog that what we recognize as modern liberalism today is slowly going to marginalize itself (as the aging hippies who make up its key demographic die off) and a new left/right divide will emerge among the people who make up the political right. As modern liberals fade out, so-called “south park” Republicans/libertarians will become more disillusioned with being lumped in with “social conservatives,” who tend to be more authoritarian in their views.

If things keep going the way they presently are, I think your predictions are probably spot on.  However, I wouldn’t underestimate liberals just yet.  Perhaps liberalism is dying in the Midwest, but over here on the East coast its still very much alive. It will be interesting to see if another liberal revolution equal to that of the 60’s will occur sometime in the next couple decades.  The political climate can be quite unpredictable at times, but I guess that’s what keeps it interesting.

Andrew on December 11, 2005 at 02:13 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.