Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Tuesday, November 15, 2005

Russert Nails Ted Kennedy

Ted Kennedy is the latest in what has become a line of Democrats to get a smack-down on their historical revisionism.

Here's the transcript:

[RUSSERT, reading quote:] We know [Iraq is] developing unmanned vehicles, capable of delivering chemical and biological warfare agents ... all U.S. intelligence experts agree that they are seeking nuclear weapons. There is little question that Saddam Hussein wants to develop them. ...In the wake of September 11th, who among us can say with any certainty, to anybody, that those weapons might not be used against our troops or against allies in the region? Who can say that this master of miscalculation will not develop a weapon of mass destruction even greater -- a nuclear weapon. ...

RUSSERT: Are those the statements you're concerned about?

Kennedy: Well, I am concerned about it, and that's why I believe that the actions that were taken by Harry Ried in the Senate last week, when effectively he said that we are going to get to the bottom of this investigation....

We've got to get to the bottom of it. And that is what the Democrats stood for on the floor of the United States Senate last week. That was a bold stroke, one that has the overwhelming support of the American people. It is about time that they got the facts on it, they haven't got them to date, they deserve them and they'll get them.

RUSSERT: But Senator, what the Democrats stood for on the floor of the Senate in 2002, let me show you who said what I just read: John Kerry, your candidate for president. He was talking about a nuclear threat from Saddam Hussein. Hillary Clinton voted for the war. John Edwards, Joe Lieberman, John Kerry. Democrats said the same things about Saddam Hussein. You yourself said quote "Saddam is dangerous, he's got dangerous weapons." It wasn't just the Bush White House.


Youch.

I think Teddy needs to go stand in the corner with Senators Levin, Rockefeller and Rep. Hinchey.

I do have one question though: Why did it take the media so long to start doing this stuff? This duality from Democrats on the pre-war intelligence issue has existed for a while now, yet they've rarely been called on it. Now that the President has begun pushing back the media decides to come along for the ride?

Update:

Video of this exchange now available here.

Comments

Avatar for Say Anything - North Dakota’s Most Popular P

[...] Russert Nails Ted Kennedy By Rob on November 15, 2005 at 8:30 am [...]

Avatar for peter

You see that type of comment from Russert is used by liberals to state the press is on our side(GOP). That they’re shrills for the GOP. Not what I believe.

peter on November 15, 2005 at 03:11 pm
Avatar for Russert Nails Ted Kennedy

[...] Skip to comments. Russert Nails Ted Kennedy say anything blog ^ | November 15, 2005 | Rob [...]

Russert Nails Ted Kennedy on November 15, 2005 at 05:12 pm
Avatar for RightFaith: Good PR Press for the President

[...] Readers:  Good grief, JR...I think you missed...uh...no, that’s all of ‘em.wow. nice work. # posted by MacStansbury : 12:06 PM, November 16, 2005   Thanks. smile # posted by JR : 12:13PM, November 16, 2005   Post a Comment Links to this post:  See links to this post   posted by @ if (typeof BL_addOnLoadEvent == ‘function’wink { BL_addOnLoadEvent(function() { BL_writeBacklinks(); }wink; } [...]

Avatar for Ron Scott

I’m frankly surprised no one in the media has acknowledged the fact that no one on this earth was more surprised to find out that there were no WMDs than Saddam himself. And he didn’t know for a very good reason. He had a bad habit of killing the messenger.

In all fairness, if the Democrats want to continue beating the drum of motivations, perhaps it’s time we revisit Chappaquidick.

Ron Scott on November 16, 2005 at 11:11 am
Avatar for Say Anything - North Dakota’s Most Popular P

[...] Video for the exchange between Ted Kennedy and Tim Russert (which I posted about here) is now available here. [...]

Avatar for Jo-Marie

Chappaquidick!  Yes, maybe Ron Scott is onto something there.  The strange voters in MA insist on keeping this clan member in our ?esteemed? Senate.  The Clintons are not the only ones who have no shame.  How many senators, then and now, spoke out against the outrageous acts of any of them?  Too late to lock the doors and windows.  Integrity has already flown out.

Jo-Marie on December 1, 2005 at 09:12 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.