Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, July 11, 2005

Rove Already Convicted In The Press

Amazing.

WASHINGTON - For the better part of two years, the word coming out of the Bush White House was that presidential adviser Karl Rove had nothing to do with the leak of a female
CIA officer's identity and that whoever did would be fired.

But Bush spokesman Scott McClellan wouldn't repeat those claims Monday in the face of Rove's own lawyer, Robert Luskin, acknowledging the political operative spoke to Matthew Cooper of Time magazine, one of the reporters who disclosed Valerie Plame's name.

McClellan repeatedly said he couldn't comment because the matter is under investigation. When it was pointed out he had commented previously even though the investigation was ongoing, he responded: "I've really said all I'm going to say on it."

Democrats jumped on the issue, calling for the administration to fire Rove, or at least to yank his security clearance. One Democrat pushed for Republicans to hold a congressional hearing in which Rove would testify.

"The White House promised if anyone was involved in the Valerie Plame affair, they would no longer be in this administration," said Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. "I trust they will follow through on this pledge. If these allegations are true, this rises above politics and is about our national security."


Nobody has even been indicted for a crime in this matter yet, much less convicted, yet already the left and the media are framing the debate over the Plame affair as though Rove had undoubtedly broken the law. Its almost as if they're all scrambling to make as much political hay out of these accusations as possible before the grand jury makes its decision and possibly exonerates Rove.

You know what's even more amazing? I bet that if you checked the record you'd find that not many of the people who are Rove's loudest critics now spoke out against Joe Wilson and his fraudulent trip to Niger. I'll bet that not one of the people who are now calling for the removal of Karl Rove's security clearance called for the removal of Valerie Plame's security clearance after her involvement with her husbands smear mission came to light.

You want a matter that is about national security? How about a supposedly undercover CIA operative sending her own husband to Niger to dredge up fake facts in an attempt to smear a sitting President?

Comments

Avatar for Random Numbers

Republican supporters sure seem worried about losing Rove as comments like the above indicate.

I’m more worried about the public lynching by the press of a possibly innocent man.

Sandy Burglar steals top-secret documents from the National Archives and gets a slap on the wrist.  Rove tells no secrets and some moonbats are talking treason.

Random Numbers on July 11, 2005 at 04:07 pm
Avatar for MikeAdamson

You want a matter that is about national security? How about a supposedly undercover CIA operative sending her own husband to Niger to dredge up fake facts in an attempt to smear a sitting President?

Republican supporters sure seem worried about losing Rove as comments like the above indicate. I doubt that Bush would ask for his resignation though. Interesting times.

MikeAdamson on July 11, 2005 at 04:07 pm
Avatar for moderninstances

Trying to change the subject is not going to make this go away.  This is not even a matter of whether he committed a crime or not, it’s about the administration keeping its word.

moderninstances on July 11, 2005 at 05:07 pm
Rob
Rob
19965 comments
Send a private message

This is not even a matter of whether he committed a crime or not, it’s about the administration keeping its word.

[...]

Trying to change the subject is not going to make this go away.

Nor will moving the goal posts convince me that Rove is deserving of some of the scorn he’s getting.

And I wasn’t trying to change the subject, just pointing out some rather inconsistent politicking.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on July 11, 2005 at 06:07 pm
Avatar for likwidshoe

moderninstances said, Trying to change the subject is not going to make this go away. This is not even a matter of whether he committed a crime or not, it’s about the administration keeping its word.

About what again? I’m confused because Richard Armitage has admitted that he is the leaker, so what would the administration have to do to be “keeping its word”?

Answer honestly now (if that’s even possible for a partisan such as yourself).

likwidshoe on September 13, 2006 at 02:08 pm
Avatar for 2Hotel9

They could prosecute Armitage. He was in the employ of the USG when he leaked this.

2Hotel9 on September 13, 2006 at 02:15 pm
Avatar for likwidshoe

They could prosecute Armitage. He was in the employ of the USG when he leaked this.

Oh, I know. But if you notice, I’m responding to a ridiculous partisan who assumed that Rove was the leaker.

It’s time to force feed these fools crow.

likwidshoe on September 13, 2006 at 02:30 pm
Avatar for 2Hotel9

Oh, I got the big, pointy spoon all ready. Just making sure the obvious is not overlooked.

2Hotel9 on September 13, 2006 at 02:38 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.